Posts: 112
Threads: 9
Joined: Feb 2015
I'm thinking I will just concentrate on this one species. They are young well under an inch. So that's good to know.
I'm still looking for something to grow in the back right corner and have not got anything growing yet.
Posts: 10,400
Threads: 875
Joined: Oct 2008
dust heavy , feed heavy. i'd dump about 50 well dusted flies in there every other day. Make sure you have good quality fresh supplements.
Posts: 112
Threads: 9
Joined: Feb 2015
I've probably been dumping 150 every other day lol
I'm useing herptitvite once a week and rep-cal calcium +d3 twice a week. They usually get one non dusted feeding a week.
Posts: 1,486
Threads: 94
Joined: Feb 2012
How are the froglets doing?
Posts: 112
Threads: 9
Joined: Feb 2015
Doing good active and eating. I do have one that is smaller than the others but seems healthy otherwise.
Posts: 1,486
Threads: 94
Joined: Feb 2012
They look good! The little guy in the back may just be a late bloomer or from a different clutch. In cases where they hide in the back, I may dump flies out front for the more aggressive feeders then sprinkle or blow flies into the back to give the less aggressive eaters something to hunt. Nice frogs!
Posts: 112
Threads: 9
Joined: Feb 2015
Thank you.
Yes the other 3 still look healthy.
He always was smaller and did not seem to grow as quickly as the others did. I still feel like I failed him in my care though.
Posts: 10,400
Threads: 875
Joined: Oct 2008
Dan,
There may have been not much you could have done. In Nature, this is survival of the fittest. Same in the vivarium, but magnified.
The herpetoculture argument is that weak or 'ill bred' froglets should be actively culled. Every runt, problem feeder, every possible genetic detraction. We have a tendency to 'baby' all these offspring and try to raise up 100% of a clutch.
I'm not saying I disagree with any of Jim's suggestions above, but keep my theory in mind for a full perspective. The combination of a weaker froglet and increasing stress from the other frogs, did it in, IMO. You COULD have separated it but again, maybe it was destined to be runty and you would only be prolonging bad genetics.
In terms of 'feeling bad' or neglectful as a human caregiver...sure, I can sympathyze. I still have issues with winning a tiny ceratophrys from the Philadephia Herp meeting back in 1988 ish and putting in a glass fish bowl with no covered top and barely wet moss. That did not go well, as you can assume.
Posts: 1,486
Threads: 94
Joined: Feb 2012
*Edit - Phil beat me to it - here's what I was about to post*
It is tough losing an animal. Honestly there are cases where some animals simply fail to thrive. I've grown out plenty of froglets and there are some little ones that just don't do well and crash. When you think about it, our artificial rearing methods select for a lot of animals that simply would not have made it normally. We pull eggs, cup rear, encourage feeding of weaker froglets...as an anecdote, when I pulled eggs from my Azureus and cup reared I could produce 20 to 30 froglets per month from that pair. When I allow the parents to tank raise, I get 1 froglet every month or two.
I'm not passing judgement on our rearing methods, just pointing out that in a lot of cases we end up with "weaker" animals. I pull eggs from my less common morphs since in many cases we simply need more animals produced, or the clutch sizes are so small and infrequent that they need more attention. That said, there's something to be said for tank reared animals.
Anyhow, don't beat yourself up. Monitor your remaining animals, consider fecal exams. You can also look into swabbing for BD and RV, but that is less common in CB animals. I agree with Phil - it's likely stress and failure to thrive, but if the remaining animals begin to decline I'd look at testing.
Posts: 112
Threads: 9
Joined: Feb 2015
Thank you. I will keep an eye on the rest and if I see any change ill send off samples Dr. Frye.